etest associates - newsletter

Welcome to the etest associates newsletter, bringing you our perspective on e-business and Information Technology Risks.

 

In this Newsletter...

 

Nectar.com: The sour taste of success?

Are companies jeopardising millions on marketing by saving a few thousand on IT?

Full article below 

 

Real World Risks
Examples of how technical risks become commercial nightmares.

Full article below

 

What are 'Concurrent Users'?

Why should you care?
Visitors, hits, impressions: common website popularity metrics but how does this translate into concurrent users?

Excerpt below

 

 

 

Nectar.com: the sour taste of success?


The embarrassing failure
of the launch of online loyalty award scheme 'Nectar' is a timely reminder of the vulnerability of a company's branding to the vagaries of the quality of their IT systems (see: Real World Risks). Steve Adams of brand consultancy Dragon claims "It is more of an issue with Nectar however (e.g. compared with Egg's launch problems) as it is replacing existing loyalty schemes. The poor press about customer dissatisfaction has compounded the problem".

 

Details of the full costs of the Nectar launch in terms of wasted marketing resources and lost opportunities have not been released, however, it is known that 'Barclaycard', one of the 4 sponsors of the scheme, was to spend a 6 figure sum advertising the launch. The total costs could be quite significant, certainly many times more than the cost of ensuring that a technical solution of proven quality was in place.

 

The embarrassment of large corporations due to IT failures and the subsequent damage to branding is well known, bankruptcy is less common. The book 'Boo Hoo: A Dot Com story' by Ernst Malmsten documents the rise and fall of Boo.Com and reminds us of a well known fatality. It appears that it was not just the high (maybe even extravagant!) burn rate alone that made the backers pullout, it was the failure of the technology to deliver a service. 

 

Brand failure scuppered Boo.Com long before the funding ran out. Other well known examples of brand damage due to technical frailty include; 'Victoria's Secret's' webcast in Feb 2001 - 1.5 million users left in the cold, 'Firestone' tyre recall in August 2000 - causes near site collapse, 'Britannica Encyclopaedia' site re-launch - 10 million users denied access, and the many reports of security compromised e-banks.

 

IT quality control is not a dark art or a complete mystery, there are tried and trusted procedures and methodologies to ensure the risks of Information Technology can be minimised. Quality does not come of it's own accord, it takes work and it takes resources. The question is not whether a company can afford it, but whether a company's branding can afford to be without it…

 

Sources:

Wired news - BooHoo Review 

Revolution Magazine - Analysis 

Revolution Magazine - 6 figure launch

 

 

 
Real World Risks


Last month, the news' attention was on Nectar
, a victim of it's own success. Wishing to reduce the costs of user registration, customers were encouraged by incentives to register online. Direct mailing to 10.5 million existing customers, TV adverts and press coverage created a significant demand. However, the Nectar.Com web site was not up to the job. Online registrations were suspended shortly after the launch and remained unavailable for several weeks.

 

These technical problems during the first few days of Nectar's launch will have caused damage not only to Nectar, but also to the four major UK companies partnering the joint reward scheme; Barclaycard, Sainsbury, BP and Debenhams. Details of the problems of the launch have been reported throughout the Internet and in the mainstream news media. (Also see 'Nectar.com: the sour taste of success?').

 

Sources:

BBC Online news 17-Sept-02

BBC Online news 20-Sept-02

Revolution Magazine Analysis 

Revolution Magazine - 6 figure launch

 

 

 

What are 'concurrent users'?
Why should you care?


How do you correlate the business perspective
of 'Numbers of Visitors' to the IT focused requirements of 'concurrent users', 'transactions per second' or 'volumes of data'?

 

Marketers and company executives gauge the popularity of their e-businesses in terms of 'initial interest', 'unique visitors', 'annual footfall' and 'registered users'. Engineers work with technical data: 'numbers of sessions', 'concurrent users', 'concurrent connections', 'requests per second' and 'numbers of sockets'.

 

Misinterpretation of the requirements... click here for more...

 

 

 

more information...
etest-associates.com
client list
about etest associates

services

Acceptance Testing and Management

security/penetration testing

load/stress testing

performance testing

monitoring

browser compatibility testing

dispute resolution deliverables assessment

localisation testing

usability testing

functional testing

system testing

macromedia zone

 

 

home  |  services  |  our clients  |  about us  |  press room  |  contact

copyright © 2000-2002 etest associates (UK) ltd.